Cases 41 - 50 of 2,406
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Defendant:
BRENDA MATTHEWS, SHAUN EDMUNSON, LT. JOHNSTON and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. PELESKY et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY and PELESKY
Petitioner:
MATTHEW R. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Vince v. Godlewski et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Defendant:
John Doe No. 2, John Carlos Rodriguez, Jr., Robert Capparell and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Anthony Vince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. et al v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00034
Defendant:
PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC, MATTHEW WILSON and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
Interested Party:
INTERTEK
Petitioner:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00033
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILSON, PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
