Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Leftwich et al v. TWS Marketing Group Inc
as 2:2011cv01879
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Leftwich and Glen Newton
Defendant:
TWS Marketing Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bank of America, N.A. v. Newton et al (CONSENT)(LEAD)
as 2:2010cv00975
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Newton, William A. Oldacre, Jr. and Mark McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bank of America, N.A. v. Newton Oldacre McDonald, LLC
as 2:2010cv00976
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Newton Oldacre McDonald, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Giles et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2010cv00779
Plaintiff:
Joshua E. Newton
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Nunley et al
as 1:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
Roderick James Hicks
Defendant:
Donnie Nunley, Walter Myers, Norman Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mello v. Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton
as 2:2010cv01521
Defendant:
Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton
Plaintiff:
Ralph W Mello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newton v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama
as 7:2009cv01540
Petitioner:
Shaquinta Denise Newton
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Newton v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
Shaquinta Denise Newton
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Martin Resource Management Corporation
as 1:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
Chester B. Newton
Defendant:
Martin Resource Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Marine-Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
