Cases 41 - 50 of 246
Staton v. Quiros al
as 3:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton and Staton
Defendant:
Caron Zylynette, Angel Quiros, Kardulos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thompson
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, Daniel Papoosha, A. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zografidis v. Richards et al
as 3:2022cv00631
Defendant:
CW-2, CW-1, Vanessa Richards and others
Plaintiff:
Konstantinos Zografidis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Commissioner et al
as 3:2022cv00465
Petitioner:
Charles C. Williams
Respondent:
Commissioner, Cotta and Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lord et al v. Padro et al
as 3:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Colleen Lord and Robert Francis Talbot, Jr.
Defendant:
Carlos Padro, Arden Coggins, Nicholas Belanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Highsmith v. McCormick et al
as 3:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Keith Highsmith
Defendant:
McCormick, Perez, Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. Little K's Landscaping, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Jairo Gonzalez, Esvelin Perez and Darwin Morales Diaz
Defendant:
Little K's Landscaping, LLC and Karl Kieslich, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calderas v. Capozziello et al
as 3:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
Roberto Calderas
Defendant:
Gianni Capozziello, City of Bridgeport, Joseph Ganim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
