Cases 41 - 50 of 135
Holmes v. Mobile Work Release et al
as 1:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wade Holmes
Defendant:
Lt Travis, Sgt. Randolph, Captain Folks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Mobile Work Release et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00998
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wade Holmes
Defendant:
Lt Travis, Sgt. Randolph, Captain Folks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00872
Defendant:
Clevon Randolph, Carter Davenport, Eddie Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Davenport et al
as 2:2018cv01448
Defendant:
Clevon Randolph and Carter Davenport
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2018cv01271
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randolph
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brownlee Morrow Company Inc v. Axxon International LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01084
Defendant:
Randolph Lenz, Art Ward, Equity Investment Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Brownlee Morrow Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00639
Defendant:
David Towers, Southern Health Partners, Sarah Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rodney Bradley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Davenport et al
as 2:2018cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houston
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Clevon Randolph and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Randolph Hall
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James v. Whitley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Lamike A. James
Defendant:
Dominic Whitley, Bryant Mims, Thyeed Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
