Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. City of Moss Point et al
as 1:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Unnamed Individuals, John Does, City of Moss Point and others
Plaintiff:
Keena Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Casey Sims
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Conklin v. Sims
as 2:2020cv00104
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Charlie Sims
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sims v. The National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00288
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Conductor Doe, The National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Marquitta Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conklin v. Forrest County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Forrest County Circuit Court, Charlie Sims, Matthew Shoemaker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Burchell
as 2:2020cv00065
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Patricia Burchell and Charlie Sims
Plaintiff:
Roderick Devon Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Perdue et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Charles Raymond Joyner, Homer Wilkes, Kerry Sims and others
Plaintiff:
Willie P. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Canton Public School District et al
as 3:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Andrew Grant, Les Penn, Erik Gilkey and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
