Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 236
United States of America v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 12-1494
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V. and MARC SMET
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 12-1417
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellant: GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V. and MARC SMET
Defendant: VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG and others
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01573
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 12-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V. and MARC SMET
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Amicus Curiae: TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Ebanks v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00743
Plaintiff: Denise Ebanks
Defendant: United States of America, American Ship Management, LLC, Patriot Contract Services, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MILLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55401
Plaintiff: CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: ALABAMA D.D. & S.B. CO., GARLOCK, INC., JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59409
Plaintiff: CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS INC, ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ERKKILA v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66145
Plaintiff: JIMMIE LIANE ERKKILA
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY and USS GREAT LAKES FLEET INC.
Thirdparty_defendant: AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLETTE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66135
Plaintiff: GEORGE THOMAS GILLETTE and BETTY M GILLETTE
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. , ALLIED INSULATION SUPPLY CO. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , FLEXITALLIC GASKET CO. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: CLEVELAND-CLIFFS IRON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?