Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Eagle #525192 v. Aramark
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dar Eagle #525192
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velthuysen #195606 v. Aramark Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00192
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Velthuysen #195606
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White #198559 v. Barry et al
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brian White #198559
Defendant:
Herbert Barry, Joseph Neher, Robert Napel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sleighter v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2013cv01071
Plaintiff:
Bradley Keith Sleighter
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Kent County Correctional Facility, Kent County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Olive Garden, GMRI, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00447
Defendant:
Olive Garden, GMRI, Inc. and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Norma Jean Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Aramark Educational Services, LLC v. V/Gladieux Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv12060
Plaintiff:
Aramark Educational Services, LLC
Defendant:
V/Gladieux Enterprises, Inc. and Timothy M. Gladieux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Thomas v. ARAMARK Higher Education/Facility Services
as 2:2011cv15412
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Thomas
Defendant:
ARAMARK Higher Education/Facility Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Harrington v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 2:2011cv14076
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Calvester Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bushon v. Aramark Campus/Aramark Educational Services, L.L.C.
as 1:2010cv11230
Plaintiff:
Stephan Bushon
Defendant:
Aramark Campus/Aramark Educational Services, L.L.C.
Searcy v. Macomb County Jail et al
as 5:2010cv11243
Plaintiff:
LaVelle W Searcy
Defendant:
Macomb County Jail, Aramark Corporation and Michelle Sanborn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
