Cases 41 - 50 of 1,392
Request for Judicial Assistance from Labor Court No. 1 in Quilmes, Province of Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina et al
as 3:2023mc80267
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from Labor Court No. 1 in Quilmes, Province of Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina
Respondent:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States of America
Sullivan et al v. Marble Hill, Ltd et al
as 1:2023cv23459
Plaintiff:
Sean Sullivan and Oceanfront Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Marble Hill, Ltd, The Government of Argentina, SERFATY LAW, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Fernando Nicols v. Minera Andina Del Sol
as 1:2023mc00545
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Fernando Nicols v. Minera Andina Del Sol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 28 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NATALIO HUPERT
as 2:2023cv21429
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 28 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NATALIO HUPERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Bainbridge Fund Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina
as 23-7112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bainbridge Fund Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee:
Republic of Argentina
Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of Original Jurisdiction No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Evangelina Cecilia Suarez v. The Coca Cola Company Co., Et Al.
as 3:2023mc00027
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of Original Jurisdiction No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Evangelina Cecilia Suarez v. The Coca Cola Company Co., Et Al.
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
as 2:2023cv17858
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Application of Dolores Acevedo, Victoria Acevedo, and Rosario Acevedo for Judicial Assistance in Obtaining Evidence for Use in Foreign Proceeding Pending Before the Courts of Argentina.
as 1:2023mc22861
In Re:
Dolores Acevedo, Victoria Acevedo, Rosario Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Trampsports, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc as Broadcast Licensee of the Argentina v. Venezuela Soccer Match doing business as Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the September 02, 2021 Argentina v. Venezuela Soccer Event doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Trampsports, LLC doing business as Mr. Tramps doing business as Mister Tramps Sports Bar doing business as Mister Tramps Sports Pub& Cafe, Michael Brandon McBride doing business as Mr. Tramps doing business as Mister Tramps Sports Bar doing business as Mister Tramps Sports Pub& Cafe, Trampsports, LLC individually doing business as Mr. Tramps doing business as Mister Tramps Sports Bar doing business as Mister Tramps Sports Pub& Cafe and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Bugliotti et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2023cv06588
Plaintiff:
Euclides Bartolome Bugliotti, Maria Cristina De Biasi, Roxana Ines Rojas and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
