Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Berry v. United States Department of Justice
as 4:2016cv00735
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Ryan et al
as 3:2016cv08264
Plaintiff:
Riki Rashaad Muhammad
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Heather Richardson, Cheryl Dossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Larson et al
as 2:2016cv02854
Respondent:
Berry L Larson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Riki Rashaad Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry v. Shartle
as 4:2016cv00131
Petitioner:
Gregory MacDonald Berry
Respondent:
John T Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berry v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2015cv02188
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America, Liberty Mutual Group Incorporated and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Joshua Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Careaga et al v. GoDaddy.com LLC
as 2:2015cv01282
Plaintiff:
Sal Careaga , Joshua Berry and Amanda Collins
Defendant:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ellertson et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00765
Defendant:
Mesa, City of , Steven Berry , Unknown Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Zan Kia Ellertson , Marianne J Ellertson and Ellertson's Dobson Ranch Mobil Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruscher v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2015cv08051
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ruscher
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontenot v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Petitioner:
Derrick Berry Fontenot
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Cisneros et al
as 2:2014cv02231
Plaintiff:
Berry Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Cisneros, Unknown Beigie and Unknown Badsted
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
