Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Rivenbark v. Canyon Sudar Partners, LLC et al
as 7:2014cv00189
Defendant:
Canyon Sudar Partners, LLC, SavaSeniorCare LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Emma R. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gardner v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Lizza Bowens Gardner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gardner v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Lizza Bowens Gardner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bowens v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Antwan Bowens, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Barnes v. Pitt County Government et al
as 5:2012ct03185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Government, North Carolina State Government, Greenville Municipal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. USA
as 5:2012cv00123
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Juvon Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, et al v. Terry, et al
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, Khadirah Ma'at Tu'pak El-Bey and Asaru Alim Nu Tu'pak El-Bey
Defendant:
B.J. Terry and Wayne Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. BOWENS, et al
as 1:2011cv00691
Plaintiff:
DARIUS E. DAVIS
Defendant:
FLORENCE A. BOWENS , RISHANDA A. FOWLER, BRIDGEFIELD MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kinchen v. Greenville Police Department et al
as 5:2011ct03107
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Kinchen
Defendant:
Greenville Police Department and Chad Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
