Cases 41 - 50 of 442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Weaver v. Erste
as 1:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Weaver
Defendant:
Dr. Brandon Erste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mayhan v. Belzar et al
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Mayhan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Belzar, Sheriff Russell L. Martin, Officer Deskin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Reese v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02190
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Reese
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris, Jacob Blake, Bianca Austin and others
Defendant:
City of Akron, Police Chief Stephen L. Mylett, Mayor Daniel Horrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weitz v. Vio Franchise Group, LLC
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Brandon Weitz
Defendant:
Vio Franchise Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Paul v. Aveni et al
as 1:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
De'Andre E. Paul, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Aveni and Brandon Shroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Aveni et al
as 2:2023cv02081
Plaintiff:
De'Andre E. Paul, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Aveni and Brandon Shroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
