Cases 41 - 50 of 2,844
US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BARRY
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
VERONICA BARRY
Interested Party:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ha v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 5:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Sally Ha
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Archer v. UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., et al.
as 24-1569
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. ARCHER
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a foreign corporation, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, UNITEDHEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation and others
Puchtler v. Barclays PLC et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
Michael Puchtler
Defendant:
Barclays PLC, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, James E. Staley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
