Cases 41 - 50 of 67
CADMUS v. SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH CAMERON, DEPUTY DAVID J. CLOSE, DEPUTY KENNETH HOLLENBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2015cv01331
Defendant:
Safeguard Properties, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Michelle Barrow and Daimean Subero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHIAROLI v. BARROW et al
as 5:2014cv06905
Plaintiff:
PETER SILVIO SCHIAROLI
Defendant:
ANDREW BARROW and MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Shipe et al
as 3:2014cv02179
Plaintiff:
Michael Silva
Defendant:
Lt. Shipe, Lt. Fago, Sgt. Belles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GERACI v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv05264
Plaintiff:
AMANDA GERACI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , DAWN BROWN , TERRA M. BARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARROWS v. COMMUNITY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2014cv02999
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARROWS
Defendant:
COMMUNITY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JACKSON v. CAMERON, et al
as 3:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
CAMERON, HOLLINBAUGH, CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYREK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05910
Plaintiff:
JOHN SYREK , GREGORY ADAMS , SHIRLEY MCCOY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TARANGO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05822
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TARANGO , GREGORY ADAMS , MARY BARKSDALE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
