Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Walters v. Bellevue Hospital Center et al
as 1:2015cv04678
Plaintiff:
Curtis James Walters
Defendant:
Bellevue Hospital Center, NYC Health Hospital Corporation, Pia Chatterjee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Bellevue Hospital Center
as 1:2015cv03046
Defendant:
Bellevue Hospital Center
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chih-Cieh Kao v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2015cv04105
Plaintiff:
Kathy Chih-Cieh Kao
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, Raymond Kelly, MTA CEO etc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little v. Bellevue Hospital Center et al
as 1:2014cv09790
Plaintiff:
Dawood Abdullah Little
Defendant:
Bellevue Hospital Center and Nicole Charder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hochmuller v. New York City Department of Law et al
as 1:2014cv08067
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hochmuller
Defendant:
New York City Department of Law, New York County District Attorney Office, Michael R. Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Texidor v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv07893
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Texidor
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Dept. of Corrections, N.Y.C. Corrections Health Services, Bellevue Hospital Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Allen v. Mitchell
as 14-141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Allen
Defendant - Appellee:
Iqbal Sohah, MD, Diana Randlett, MD, Charap H. Mitchell, MD and others
WROBLESKI v. ACS et al
as 2:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
JESSICA WROBLESKI
Defendant:
ACS, MANHATTAN FAMILY COURT, LITTLE FLOWER FOSTER AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
