Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Bey v. Garcia
as 4:2021cv04105
Petitioner:
NiYah Keymon Ale Bey
Respondent:
Mario Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bey v. Judge Josh Hill
as 4:2021cv03093
Petitioner:
James Aves Bey and Jonathan Aves Bey
Respondent:
Judge Josh Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2021cv02972
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ra'id Bey
Defendant:
State of Texas, For Bend County Court at Law No. 1, Rosenberg Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Talib et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 4:2021cv02805
Plaintiff:
Jamhal Talib, Abdullah Bey, Will Musa and others
Defendant:
Medford State Police, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Emily A. Karstetter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Bey v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2021cv00447
Petitioner:
Knowledge Divine Bey
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Byrd v. Holmes et al
as 3:2021cv01838
Plaintiff:
Noland Byrd and Mustafa el Shabazz Bey
Defendant:
Tracy Holmes, John Cruezot and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al v. Abbott et al
as 3:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Frank D Osborne, Steven Elliot Reis, Gregg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Kamal Bey and Takijah Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 1:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Knowledge Divine Bey
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Beaumont District Parole Office, Holly Champange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Beaumont Police Officers et al
as 1:2021cv00297
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Erica E. Deal, Zena Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Knowledge Divine Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
