Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Adams v. Elmore County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00783
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail and Bill Franklin
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Parker
Defendant:
Robert Henline and Bill Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
James Earl Marshall
Defendant:
Bill Franklin and Robert Henline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Elmore County Sheriff's Department (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lane Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
B J Wilson, Bill Franklin and Deputy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overall v. Franklin (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Mark Overall
Defendant:
Bill Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Elmore County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
David O. Oliver
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Robert Henline, Spv Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Elmore County Jail et al
as 2:2012cv04061
Plaintiff:
David O Oliver
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Henline, Richardson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fanary v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Fanary
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Robert Henline, Sgt. Stroud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. East, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
William Henry Singleton, III
Defendant:
Officer East, Officer Barris, Officer Driscal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
