Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bolanos v. Jenkins
as 3:2020cv03825
Petitioner:
Gaylene L. Bolanos
Respondent:
Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv04646
Defendant:
Janice Hahn, Federal Glover, Don Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. d/b/a Patioworld and Stanislaus Funding, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Patioworld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoon v. Newsom et al
as 3:2020cv03141
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Supervisor David Canepa, City of Pacifica and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Antoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Bolanos et al
as 5:2020cv02856
Defendant:
John W. Monsey, Carlos G. Bolanos, Alma Zamora and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altman et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2020cv02180
Defendant:
Sheriff David Livingston, Sara Cody, Edgardo Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Swann, Firearms Policy Coalition, Roman Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallagher v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2020cv01443
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services and Carlos Bolanos
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Juan Lloyd v. David Bolanos et al
as 2:2019cv10663
Defendant:
Kyle Thorstenson and David Bolanos
Plaintiff:
Adrian Juan Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maribel Bolanos v. Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. et al
as 5:2019cv02413
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Management Corp., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Maribel Bolanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
