Cases 41 - 50 of 287
(PC) Martinez v. Rodriguez
as 1:2021cv01495
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack T Mootz v. C. Rodriguez
as 2:2021cv08626
Petitioner:
Jack T Mootz
Respondent:
C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, et al v. Doctor's Associates, LLC
as 21-1776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAGDA C. RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ and FELIX PENA-FERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, LLC
(PC)Frye v. Pfiefer et al
as 1:2021cv01525
Plaintiff:
Jhonathan Frye
Defendant:
Pfiefer, D. Vasquez, C. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Marquez v. C. Rodriguez, et al
as 21-55981
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVE MARQUEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
C. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer at M.C.C. Federal Prison and L. KELLY, Correctional Officer at M.C.C. Federal Prison
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID L. YOUNG, Warden of M.C.C. Federal Prison and others
UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2021cv16500
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JUAN C. RODRIGUEZ and RODRIGUEZ INCOME TAXES, LLC
Jermaine Johnson v. C. Rodriguez
as 2:2021cv07121
Petitioner:
Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43629
Plaintiff:
JOE C RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Real Estate Automation LLC et al v. Sheltering Pines LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00999
Defendant:
Sheltering Pines LLC, Unlimited Abundance Enterprises LLC, Marsh J David and others
Plaintiff:
Real Estate Automation LLC and Thomas C Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
