Cases 41 - 50 of 378
McNeill et al v. Carter-Jones Companies, Inc.
as 2:2022cv11661
Plaintiff:
Gregory McNeill and Cindy McNeill
Defendant:
Carter-Jones Companies, Inc. Doing business as Carter Lumber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell et al v. Washington
as 4:2021cv10705
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Bell, Martinneze Moore, Alan Lane and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Richard Russell, Gary Miniard and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Carol Walker, Eustachio Villarreal, Dr. Sharon Oliver and others
Tink et al v. DEWITTE et al
as 2:2021cv10957
Defendant:
BRIAN HENDERSON, JEROME BOL, MANU KOTHARI and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Tink and Retail Simply LLC Doing business as inGENIUS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jarrett #173944 v. Lakeland Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Jarrett #173944
Defendant:
Lakeland Correctional Facility, Bryan Morrison, Robert Ault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv10661
Plaintiff:
Darren Johnson
Defendant:
Carter, Growdy, Owens and others
Carter v. Sprader
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
James T. Carter
Defendant:
Branda E. Sprader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
DUNLAP v. BARRICK, OFFICER et al
as 2:2022cv10553
Plaintiff:
IMANI DUNLAP
Defendant:
ZACHARY BARRICK, OFFICER, CHRIS RABION, OFFICER, R. CARTER, OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Carter v. Westshore Engineering and Surveying et al
as 1:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. Carter
Defendant:
Westshore Engineering and Surveying, Scott Tucker doing business as H&M Demolitions Company, Inc. and Jaline Tucker doing business as H&M Demolitions Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
