Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 21-6911
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and ROY COOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON, EDDIE THOMAS, BRYANT SOUCIER, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD
Delamar v. Central Prison
as 5:2021ct03066
Plaintiff:
Brandon Delamar
Defendant:
Central Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kayie Wright v. Johnny Hawkins
as 21-6050
Defendant / Appellee:
GILLIO, JOHN DOE, Maintenance Worker, JANE DOE, Psychiatrist, Central Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
McQuaig v. Central Prison et al
as 5:2020ct03267
Defendant:
Central Prison, Scotland Correction and Scotland Memorial Hospital
Plaintiff:
Frederick B. McQuaig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Burr v. Denise Jackson
as 20-5
Respondent / Appellee:
DENISE JACKSON, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BURR
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-6054
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and ROY COOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON, EDDIE THOMAS, BRYANT SOUCIER, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD
Thomas Larry v. Edward Thomas
as 19-6
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN EDWARD THOMAS, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS MICHAEL LARRY
Jeffrey Kandies v. Edward Thomas
as 19-4
Respondent / Appellee:
EDWARD THOMAS, Warden, Central Prison
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY CLAYTON KANDIES
Antonio Ortiz v. George Solomon
as 19-6456
Defendant:
DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER AT MARION PRISON, MEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR AT TROY PRISON, DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER AT CALEDONIA PRISON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLTON JOYNER, OLUSHOLA METIKO, THAYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
William Gray, Jr. v. Erik Hooks
as 19-6451
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBERT GRAY, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
