Cases 41 - 50 of 68
CUMMINGS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., DANAWITZ, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
GUY CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. DALLAS et al
as 1:2013cv00731
Defendant:
MS ANGEL, EDDIE BUSS, DR COCKERELL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
James E Johnson
Defendant:
Michael A Mitcheff, Rose Vaisvilos, Lynn Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2013cv00235
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., DANAWITZ, M.D. STEPHEN DANNEWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
GUY CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Christensen et al v. Cummings et al
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
William Christensen and Charmian Christensen
Defendant:
Ronnie Cummings, Jr and CRST Expedited Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BARICH v. HENNESSY et al
as 2:2012mc00006
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARICH
Defendant:
JAMES CUMMINGS and PETER HENNESSY
CUMMINGS v. QUAKENBUSH et al
as 1:2012cv01538
Defendant:
MARK J. BOWEN, MARK EPPERSON, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
KRIS R. CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Defendant:
RODNEY J. CUMMINGS, MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT IV-D, MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON-JEREL: JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Clark et al
as 3:2012cv00554
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Wade
Defendant:
Karen Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
