Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Camacho v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02112
Plaintiff:
Daniel Camacho
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., Bruno Stolc and Gilbert Lagunas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Briones v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Briones
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Unknown Gordon, Unknown Ickes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Camacho et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Alma Camacho and Fernando Ibarra
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Aurora Loan Services, Home123 Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Camacho v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01417
Plaintiff:
Rene Camacho
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Qualls and Ivan Bartos
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hakl-St. Pierre-Camacho v. Fort McDowell Indian Community et al
as 2:2008cv01210
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Hakl-St. Pierre-Camacho
Defendant:
Fort McDowell Indian Community and Rolando Camacho, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Camacho v. Arizona, State of
as 4:2008cv00254
Petitioner:
John Camacho
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Camacho v. Borek et al
as 4:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
John Camacho
Defendant:
Ted B. Borek, Gus Aragon, Nannette Moral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Camacho v. Jones et al
as 2:2007cv00812
Plaintiff:
Rene Camacho
Defendant:
James Jones, Audrey Burke, Stacy Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
