Cases 41 - 50 of 137
GRUSHACK v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
JUDITH M. PERSICHILLI, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRUSHACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRUSHACK v. NJ DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00623
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON, ASST. SUPERVISOR MARC SIMS, MARCUS O HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRUSHACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTHY v. JACOBS et al
as 3:2020cv15213
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON and JENNIFER LANGER JACOBS
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODNEY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2020cv14983
Plaintiff:
NOOR MOODNEY
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 5:2020cv00402
Defendant:
H&CS Services, LLC d/b/a Community Ambulance, John and Janes Does, Zoll Medical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Johnson and Carol Johnson, as administrator of the Estate and Surviving Spouse of Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RADETICH v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2020cv10097
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RADETICH
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON and JENNIFER LANGER JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. JACOBS et al
as 2:2020cv09501
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON and JENNIFER LANGER JACOBS
Plaintiff:
CHUIN LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Zynga Inc.
as 4:2020cv02024
Defendant:
Zynga Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Johnson and Lisa Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUSHING v. JACOBS et al
as 2:2020cv00130
Plaintiff:
JANE CUSHING
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON and JENNIFER LANGER JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DURMER et al v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv19259
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. BANDA, BRUCE L JENNINGS, JOEL E. DURMER and others
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON, MARCUS O. HICKS, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
