Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Eric Howard v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 13-6095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC BERNARD HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ARVIL CHAPMAN, Warden, CAPTAIN JACKSON, Shift Supervisor and others
Michael Rufus v. Warden, Jenkins CC, et al
as 12-15453
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH CHAPMAN, Warden, Jenkins Correctional Center and STATE OF GEORGIA
Randolph Baird v. April Chapman
as 11-7462
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDOLPH STEPHEN BAIRD
Respondent - Appellee:
APRIL CHAPMAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Respondent:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, HENRY MCMASTER, (actually named as The Attorney General of the State of: South Carolina, Henry McMaster) and others
Mark Bowers v. Bruce Chapman
as 11-10862
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK BOWERS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRUCE CHAPMAN, Warden
Nunn v. Chapman, et al
as 11-1078
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYFEAL R. NUNN
Respondent - Appellee:
ANVIL CHAPMAN, Warden of CCA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Vickie Huff v. Lt. Chapman
as 10-15097
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICKIE HUFF
Respondent - Appellee:
LT. TOM CHAPMAN, Warden
Thomas Elza, Jr. v. Avril Chapman
as 10-6187
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS ELZA, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
AVRIL CHAPMAN, Warden
Shirley Aldridge v. Joe Keffer
as 10-10725
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHIRLEY L ALDRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
W. ELAINE CHAPMAN, Warden, FMC-Carswell
Tasha Lee v. Tom Chapman, et al
as 10-12177
Petitioner - Appellant:
TASHA MONIQUE LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CHAPMAN, Warden, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Bergman v. Carswell Medical Center et al
as 4:2010cv00315
Petitioner:
Gwen Bergman
Respondent:
Carswell Medical Center, Elaine Chapman, Warden, Kevin McNeary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
