Cases 41 - 50 of 72
ALLRED v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LEE ALLRED
Defendant:
COX, CHARLIE DANIELS, DIRECTOR MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. Herny et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
Marty Herny, Tommy Essiex, Coca Cola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00012
Defendant:
BROOKS, CHARLIE DANIELS, FCI/USP TERRE HAUTE and others
Plaintiff:
LOUSHAWN A. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEROTTI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 2:2015cv00067
Defendant:
GARY ALLRED, M. ANDREIS, BOND and others
Debtor-in-Posse:
SGT. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. PEROTTI and PATRICK J. ROSELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHARPLESS V. ECHO OF MOVEMENT, et al.
as 1:2015cv00051
Defendant:
ECHO OF MOVEMENT, INC. and M. CHARLIE MARSH
Plaintiff:
JOHN SHARPLESS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fisher v. Rogers et al
as 3:2014cv01666
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Fisher
Defendant:
Bradley Rogers, John Perry, Stephen Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01536
Plaintiff:
Charlie Marshall
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00758
Plaintiff:
Lena Neal and Charlie Neal
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLINS et al v. POLLY et al
as 1:2013cv01838
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTH, INC., NADIR AL-SHAMI, JOE BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
