Cases 41 - 50 of 198
Seward v. Antonini et al
as 7:2020cv09251
Defendant:
Det. Camilo R. Antonini, P.O. Robert G. Puff, Det. Sgt. Sean J. Fegan and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Seward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarrant v. City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2020cv09003
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon and Sergeant Stewart
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
County Of Westchester and Detective Camilo Antonini
Plaintiff:
Gordon Michael Tarrant and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. City of Mount Vernon
as 7:2020cv08958
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon
Plaintiff:
Bryan Whitley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv07021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Giles v. City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2020cv05119
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon, David Sanchez, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEASLEY v. MAYBIN et al
as 3:2020cv00032
Defendant:
CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, Doug Maybin, MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEASLEY v. MAYBIN et al
as 5:2020cv00088
Defendant:
SHERIFF DOUG MAYBIN, CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JABARI BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv02998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sh
Ketcham v. City of Mount Vernon
as 20-14
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Mount Vernon, Michael Hutchins, Allen Patterson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Ketcham
Kelly v. The City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2019cv11369
Defendant:
The Acocella Law Group P.C., The City of Mount Vernon, The City of Mount Vernon Urban Renewal Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
