Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McAteer v. Bolling et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee McAteer
Defendant:
Leon Bolling , Susan Clemons and Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2011cv04067
Plaintiff:
Bradley S. Patterson
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Marshall County Department of Human Resources, Wesfam Restaurants, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrenko v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00978
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Chrenko
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels , C. McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Phillips
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Griffin
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00975
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Caldwell
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Barley
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horsman v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
William W. Horsman, III
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv03517
Plaintiff:
Twana Clemons
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
