Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Carey v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2014cv00948
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Cassandra Conway , Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Billups, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00888
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Phyllis Billups, Cassandra Conway, Captain Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Stewart et al
as 1:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Cynthia Stewart, Terry Raybon, Shirley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldman v. Thomas et al
as 5:2013cv02322
Plaintiff:
Adam Keith Waldman
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Cassandra Conway, Amanda Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway Steel Fabrication Inc v. Stabridg Construction Co Inc
as 2:2013mc02290
Plaintiff:
Conway Steel Fabrication Inc
Defendant:
Stabridg Construction Co Inc
Glynn v. Conway et al
as 5:2013cv02049
Plaintiff:
Pierre Glynn
Defendant:
Cassandra Conway, Kristie Bias, Dewayne Estes and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldman v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00783
Plaintiff:
Adam Keith Waldman
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Cassandra Conway, Amanda Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2013cv01365
Plaintiff:
Rashad C Lee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, James Deloach, Grant Culliver and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Abraham Kelly
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Mark Bruton and Cassandra Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013mc00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
