Cases 41 - 50 of 64
ALLEN v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2011cv05602
Plaintiff:
SHERYL J. ALLEN
Defendant:
JOSEPH SWEENEY, ROBERT TURNER, DARIUS GRAZIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURTS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45164
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. CURTS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KOSOW v. USA
as 2:2010cv01604
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CURT D. KOSOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Amos v. Franklin Financial Services Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01285
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Amos, Christine A. Amos, Robert A. Abel and others
Defendant:
Franklin Financial Services Corporation, Lowell R. Gates, Linda Lee Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
HARSHMAN v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
CURT D. HARSHMAN
Defendant:
HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC and ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CURTS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31777
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. CURTS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
CURT THOMAS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, CYNTHIA DAUB, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Copelin v. Rothermel et al
as 3:2009cv02336
Plaintiff:
Darrius Copelin
Defendant:
Curt Rothermel, Lamar Cressinger, J. Benfer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VORA v. FISHER et al
as 3:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant:
RONALD FISHER, COURIER EXPRESS, WESTCO INS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
THOMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 2:2009cv04980
Plaintiff:
CURT THOMAS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, CYNTHIA DAUB, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
