Cases 41 - 50 of 265
White, D.P.M. v. St. Joseph's Medical Practice, P.C. et al
as 7:2020cv04223
Plaintiff:
Dr. Daniel White, D.P.M.
Defendant:
Dr. James Neuendorf, M.D., St. Joseph's Medical Center and St. Joseph's Medical Practice, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Stevens v. White
as 3:2020cv05521
Petitioner:
Jeremy Thomas Stevens
Respondent:
Daniel White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. White
as 3:2020cv05357
Petitioner:
Corean Omarus Barnes
Respondent:
Daniel White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Serna et al v. White et al
as 1:2020cv00299
Defendant:
David Webster, Margette Webster and Daniel White
Plaintiff:
Emma Serna and Mike Serna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38269
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34954
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN DANIEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34957
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DANIEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27227
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY DANIEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Peroza-Benitez v. Darren Smith, et al
as 20-1390
Defendant:
NICHOLAS EPOLITO and OFFICER DANIEL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
C.I. MICHAEL PERKINS, C.I. KEVIN HASER and C.I. DARREN C. SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ
Thibodeaux v. White et al
as 3:2020cv05110
Defendant:
Junie, Russell Harold and Daniel White
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
