Cases 41 - 50 of 246
Oppenheimer v. Pugh et al
as 1:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Danny F. Pugh, Paul S. Heathman and Mountain Dreams Realty of WNC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
LONG v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2021cv00672
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VAN LONG
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY CO. OF AMERICA and WELLPATH MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. HOEKSTRA
as 1:2021cv00616
Petitioner:
DANNY WILLIAM YOUNG
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS and CASANDRA SKINNER HOEKSTRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORD v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
DANNY LAMORE FORD
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Alliance of Professionals & Consultants, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Alliance of Professionals & Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danny McCormick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00488
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, PROSECTORIAL DISTRICT, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. FERGUSON et al
as 1:2021cv00363
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FRYE, DANNY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00288
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ROCKY JOYNER, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY LAMORE FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
