Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
SHARP v. DICKENSON
as 1:2009cv00226
Plaintiff: CHARLES THOMAS SHARP, JR.
Defendant: DIANNE DICKENSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BELL et al v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORP. et al
as 1:2009cv00191
Plaintiff: LEONARD BELL and DIANNE BELL
Defendant: CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORP., CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT and MATTHEW KINKADE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00298
Plaintiff: Diann A Parham
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KELLER v. HANLON et al
as 1:2008cv00722
Plaintiff: JOHN W. KELLER
Defendant: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, THOMAS HANLON, DIANNE ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bauer et al v Shepard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00196
Plaintiff: Torrey Bauer, Torrey Bauer, David Certo and others
Defendant: Randall T Shepard, Stephen L Williams, Joan M Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00938
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00196
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
George v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00136
Plaintiff: Dianne George
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMITH v. QUOINES et al
as 2:2007cv00077
Plaintiff: JAMES PRESTON SMITH
Defendant: DIANNE QUOINES, THE UDC, DHO OF USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2007mc00053
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant: BRADY SMITH, DIANNE SHEPARD, KATHRYN FLETCHER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?