Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Marin et al v. Pepe's Retail Meats, Inc. d/b/a Perez Restaurant et al
as 1:2014cv00397
Defendant:
Pepe's Retail Meats, Inc. and Jose Perez
Plaintiff:
Karla Marin , Tania Melendez , Everardo Mascoti and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Gutierrez et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-23192
Plaintiff:
Karen Gutierrez and Daniel Gutierrez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Gutierrez et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv23192
Plaintiff:
Karen Gutierrez and Daniel Gutierrez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEMODULATION, INC. v. BIRNBACH et al
as 2:2013cv04736
Plaintiff:
DEMODULATION, INC.
Defendant:
CURTIS BIRNBACH , DANIEL GUTIERREZ, ADVANCED FUSION SYSTEMS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
USA v. Daniel Gutierrez-Duene
as 12-14559
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL GUTIERREZ-DUENES
USA v. Daniel Gutierrez-Duene
as 12-14555
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL GUTIERREZ-DUENES, a.k.a. Juan Vasquez, a.k.a. Jose Vasquez
Gutierrez et al v. Spatara et al
as 1:2012cv02113
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez , Joel Ramirez and Petranka Georgieva
Defendant:
Luino, Inc., Christine Spatara, Anthony D. Spatara and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Gutierrez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 9:2011cv81077
Plaintiff:
Danielle Gutierrez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Gutierrez et al
as 6:2011cv00771
Plaintiff:
Ricardo D. Thompson
Defendant:
Daniel Gutierrez, Charles Crawford, Ernestine Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2011cv00421
Plaintiff:
Ricardo D. Thompson
Defendant:
Daniel Gutierrez, Charles Crawford, Ernestine Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
