Cases 41 - 50 of 605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deloach v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv11224
Plaintiff:
Trina Deloach
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morales v. Deloach, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lee Nelly Morales
Defendant:
Willie James Deloach, Jr. and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
DeLoach v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Joni DeLoach
Defendant:
Exactech Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 23-10146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-14263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Johnson v. Vasquez, et al
as 22-1450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
VASQUEZ, JACKSON, LONG and others
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2022cv04925
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Sheriff Melody Maddox, Governor Brian Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
