Cases 41 - 50 of 925
Braswell v. Ruby
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Earl Braswell
Defendant:
Dr. Ruby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Defendant:
DR MARK M WHITAKER, Sheriff William Watson, Brett Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Mark M. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Waseem v. Stability AI Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Dr. Tayab Waseem
Defendant:
Mohammad Emad Mostaque, Stability AI, Inc. and Stability AI LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carr v. Simoplous
as 7:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Simoplous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Dinwiddie Court et al
as 3:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Goodwin
Defendant:
Dinwiddie Court, Mrs. Bradshaw, Ms. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boardwine v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jo L. Boardwine
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wood v. Clarke et al.
as 1:2023cv01809
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robertson v. Virginia State University et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Bridgett P. Robertson
Defendant:
Virginia State University, Makola M. Abdullah, Ph.D., Tia A. Minnis, Ph.D and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Browne v. Cane
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Zachary Russo Browne
Defendant:
Dr. James H. Cane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
