Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Neal v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
Dwight Neal
Defendant:
Superintendent, Ms Ross, Ms Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 1:2016cv01218
Defendant:
JACKSON, MIEVES, ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Dwight D Rush and Phyllis Rush
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc, Wright Medical Group, Inc and Wright Medical Group, N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER ET AL. v. ZENDER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2015cv01876
Plaintiff:
CLYDE A. FISHER and DANIEL DWIGHT FISHER
Defendant:
ZENDER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dewert v. Speakman
as 1:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
William E Dewert
Defendant:
Dwight S Speakman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. Victory Road Transportation LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
Defendant:
Victory Road Transportation LLC, Dwight K Weisner, Laury Transportation LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THORNTON v. BUTLER et al
as 4:2014cv00025
Defendant:
DWIGHT BUTLER, BUTLER AUCTION, SEMONIN AUCTION and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner et al v. Vincent et al
as 2:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dwight Gardner and Calumet Township Trustee
Defendant:
Micah G Vincent and Mike Pence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRONIN v. DUFFEY et al
as 2:2013cv00419
Defendant:
BRIAN BOLLINGER, JEROME BROOKS, DEWICK BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DMITRY PRONIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HARRIS v. IMPD et al
as 2:2013cv00310
Defendant:
5 UNKNOWN PATROL OFFICERS and IMPD
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DWIGHT HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
