Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDANIEL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48338
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. MCDANIEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
McDaniel v. Judd et al
as 8:2011cv01395
Petitioner:
Connie E. McDaniel
Respondent:
Grady Judd, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. WARD et al
as 3:2009cv00436
Defendant:
WILLIAM R WARD, CLASSIC HOME BUILDERS INC., JAMES R LEE and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
MCDANIEL V. MEAD, ET AL.
as 2:2009cv87609
Plaintiff:
JOE E. MCDANIEL
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCDANIEL et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv85157
Plaintiff:
GARLAND E. MCDANIEL, GARLAND E. MCDANIEL, VIRGINIA MCDANIEL and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCDANIEL v. GARLOCK INC et al
as 2:2009cv68887
Plaintiff:
COLVIN E MCDANIEL, COLVIN E MCDANIEL and COLVIN E MCDANIEL
Defendant:
GARLOCK INC, GARLOCK INC, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McDaniel v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2008cv01250
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. McDaniel
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01926
Plaintiff:
Donald Aaron, Jose C. Alaniz, Evelyn F. Alexander and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation, Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
