Cases 41 - 50 of 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Defendant:
Jonathan Smith, Cari Staley, John Doe Staley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company v. Cantu
as 2:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marie Elizabeth Cantu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pond et al v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv05849
Plaintiff:
Renee Pond, P.D., C.D. and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Allison Woods and State Agents 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caterpiller Credito
as 2:2022mc00075
Petitioner:
Caterpiller Credito
In Re:
T-Mobile
Interested Party:
Carolina Elizabeth Varady de Bellosta and Carlos Mercelino Jose Bellosta Pallares
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03119
Plaintiff:
Janie Elizabeth Gutierrez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jenkins v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2022cv00786
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Neil, Ravencamp, El Paso County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
