Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Edmonds v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01820
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Arizona Department of Corrections and Arizona Parole Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edmonds v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01734
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edmonds v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01137
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections and Corazon Health Care Systems
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2014cv01136
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv02055
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edmond Cochran
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Keith Smith, Robert Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gasaway v. Winn
as 4:2013cv00906
Petitioner:
Edmond Gasaway
Respondent:
Louis W Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gasaway v. Winn
as 4:2013cv00905
Petitioner:
Edmond Gasaway
Respondent:
Louis W Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gasaway v. Unknown Party
as 4:2013cv00378
Petitioner:
Edmond Gasaway
Defendant:
Louis W Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gasaway v. Winn
as 4:2013cv00270
Petitioner:
Edmond Gasaway
Respondent:
Louis W Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
