Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Ana Martinez v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Trust Employee Welfare Plan
as 2:2011cv02304
Plaintiff: Ana Martinez
Defendant: The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Trust Employee Welfare Plan
FREY v. HERR FOODS INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01416
Plaintiff: BARRY FREY
Defendant: HERR FOODS INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ADAMS v. THE LILLY EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN
as 1:2011cv00074
Plaintiff: JENNIFER ADAMS
Defendant: THE LILLY EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tom Radey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00344
Defendant: California Institute of Technology Employee Welfare Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Tom Radey
Ana Martinez v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bu, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-56370
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: ANA MARTINEZ
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: THE BEVERLY HILLS HOTEL AND BUNGALOWS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN
Counter-defendant - Appellee: U.S. BANCORP, a Delaware corporation, DBA U.S. Bank as trustee of the Steve Martinez Special Needs Trust
Oleg Manyak v. Blackrock, Inc., et al
as 10-35483
Plaintiff - Appellant: OLEG MANYAK
Defendant - Appellee: BLACKROCK, INC., as Plan Administrator of the Blackrock Employee Welfare Plan, BLACKROCK EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, doing business as MetLife
Rodden v. John Hancock
as 10-6055
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHERINE RODDEN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN, FKA John Hancock, Mutual Life Insurance Company Employee Welfare Plan
Manyak v. Blackrock Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01297
Plaintiff: Oleg Manyak
Defendant: Blackrock Inc, Blackrock Employee Welfare Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Van Eaton v. Harrison, et al
as 09-1193
Plaintiff - Appellant: CONSTANCE VAN EATON
Defendant - Appellee: LEE HECHT HARRISON, LLC. Employee Welfare Plan, ADECCO GROUP NORTH AMERICA and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Metlife
Ana Martinez v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Trrust Employee Welfare Plan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01222
Plaintiff: Ana Martinez
Defendant: The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Trrust Employee Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?