Cases 41 - 50 of 221
Johnson v. Banos
as 3:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Banos
as 3:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2021cv09971
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Daly City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv09972
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Kathleen Allen and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv02348
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allen and Warden of Solano State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Laquan Johnson
as 22-6065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAQUAN EUGENE JOHNSON, a/k/a Turtle
Ronnie Johnson v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 21-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 5:2021cv09385
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe and Daly City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv09367
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Kathleen Allen and Warden of Solano State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Friell Johnson
as 21-14144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRIELL EUGENE JOHNSON, a.k.a. realrambo3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
