Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 63
HAWKINS v. EWING et al
as 2:2015cv00233
Defendant: PATTY BAUER, GREG EWING, CHARLES FUNK and others
Plaintiff: KIM HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUTSON v. BELLE et al
as 2:2015cv00091
Defendant: STEPHEN BELLE, GREGORY EWING, CHARLES FUNK and others
Plaintiff: MARK A. HUTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EWING v. FCI TERRE HAUTE WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00007
Plaintiff: JOSHUA EWING
Defendant: FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00090
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00091
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00086
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00088
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00087
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00089
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING and MICHAEL P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELL v. EWING
as 2:2014cv00076
Petitioner: GRAYLON D. BELL
Respondent: GREG EWING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?