Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Freeman v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
Kevin Freeman, Sr
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Edward Flynn, Edith Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Freeman v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and Warsaw Orthopedic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lim, Khor v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Scott Walker, John J. McAlary, Diane F. Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lim, Khor v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2012cv00552
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Scott Walker, John J. McAlary, Diane F. Bosse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeman, Raychelle v. Total Security Management - Wisconsin, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00461
Plaintiff:
Raychelle Freeman
Defendant:
Total Security Management - Wisconsin, LLC and Total Security Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman, Ricky v. John Doe Officers 1-10 et al
as 3:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ricky Freeman
Defendant:
John Doe Officers 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman, Mary v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2012cv00161
Petitioner:
Mary E. Freeman
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luse, Duane v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Duane Luse
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin , Walker, Van Hollen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Approximately $14391 US Currency et al
as 2:2011cv01002
Defendant:
Approximately $14391 US Currency and 2003 Lincoln Aviator VIN #5LMEU88H83ZJ15683
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Karl James Freeman and Mary Brown
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Carr v. Beth et al
as 2:2011cv00996
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Beth, Charles Smith, Captain Falduto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
