Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Crystal Springs Upland School v. FieldTurf USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01335
Plaintiff:
Crystal Springs Upland School
Defendant:
FieldTurf USA, Inc. , FieldTurf, Inc. and FieldTurf Tarkett SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bret Harte Union High School District v. Fieldturf USA, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Bret Harte Union High School District
Defendant:
Fieldturf, USA, Inc. , Fieldturf, Inc. and Fieldturf Tarkett SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bret Harte Union High School District v. FIELDTURF USA, INC. et al
as 1:2016at00195
Plaintiff:
Bret Harte Union High School District
Defendant:
FIELDTURF USA, INC., Fieldturf, Inc. and Fieldturf Tarkett SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaffey Joint Union High School District et al v. Fieldturf USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Chaffey Joint Union High School District
Defendant:
Fieldturf Tarkett SAS, Fieldturf USA, Inc. and Fieldturf, Inc.
Winslow Unified School District No. 1 v. FieldTurf USA Incorporated et al
as 3:2014cv08073
Plaintiff:
Winslow Unified School District No. 1
Defendant:
FieldTurf USA Incorporated , FieldTurf Tarkett SAS , Atlas Tracks Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FieldTurf USA, Inc. et al v. TenCate Thiolon Middle East, LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00105
Plaintiff:
FieldTurf Inc., FieldTurf Tarkett SAS and FieldTurf USA, Inc.
Respondent:
FieldTurf Inc., FieldTurf Tarkett SAS and FieldTurf USA, Inc.
Movant:
Hellas Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Polyloom Corporation of America, TenCate Thiolon B.V. and TenCate Thiolon Middle East, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
FieldTurf USA Inc. et al v. TenCate Thiolon Middle East, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
FieldTurf USA Inc. , FieldTurf Inc. and FieldTurf Tarkett SAS
Defendant:
TenCate Thiolon Middle East, LLC , Polyloom Corporation of America and TenCate Thiolon B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.