Cases 41 - 50 of 185
Center for Environmental Health et al v. Pruitt et al
as 3:2018cv03197
Plaintiff:
Center for Environmental Health , Center for Biological Diversity and Californians for Pesticide Reform
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt, United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Fish & Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 18-15041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-17547
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellant:
RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
United States Fish & Wildlife Service and Ryan Zinke
Intervenor_defendant:
Montana Trappers Association , National Trappers Association and Fur Information Council of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Friends of the Wild Swan, Inc., et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 17-35572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE WILD SWAN, INC., a Montana nonprofit corporation and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, a Montana nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, Robyn Thorson, Pacific Region Director, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, S.M.R. Jewell, Secretary and others
Native Ecosystems Council et al v. Erickson et al
as 9:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Native Ecosystems Council and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Defendant:
Mary Erickson, Leanne Marten, Thomas L. Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of Animals, et al v. Phifer, et al
as 17-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDLIFE ALLIANCE OF MAINE, ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL PHIFER, in his official capacity as Assistant Regional Director of Ecological Services for the Northeast Regional Office of the United States Fish Wildlife Service, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Martin et al
as 9:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant:
Leanne Marten , United States Forest Service and United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Sea Urchin Comm., et al v. Rachel Jacobson, et al
as 17-55428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ABALONE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LOBSTER AND TRAP FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RACHEL JACOBSON, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife & Parks, Department of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-35953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, WILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and USDA WILDLIFE SERVICES
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHWEST RIVERPARTNERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
