Cases 41 - 50 of 1,105
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Lagrange v. Eagle, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Irma Lee Legrange and Irma Lee Lagrange
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Eagle, Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience Inc., Paramount Global, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Uniroyal Holding, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Cadiere v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cadiere, Sr. and Bradley Joseph Cadiere, Sr.
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls, Inc., Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's of London, Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gallo et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Angela Bernhardine Gallo and Lisa Antionietta Lieselotte Gallo
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Craig v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Redco Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant:
Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant:
Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
JOHN CRANE INC. v. COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
as 1:2022cv06146
Plaintiff:
JONNET YOUNG
Petitioner:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC
Respondent:
COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Mary Spurlin, et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY SPURLIN
Plaintiff:
DALE M. SPURLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and DOES, 1 through 400, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
