Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wynn v. Fulton County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2012cv00239
Petitioner:
Bobby Wynn
Respondent:
Fulton County Sheriffs Office, Theodore Jackson and Deputies, Jailers, Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Fulton County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Denny Adams
Defendant:
Fulton County Fiscal Court , Fulton County Sheriff's Office and Danny Zickefoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leeks v. Fulton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2011cv01692
Plaintiff:
Etroma Leeks, III
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Office, Fulton County Jail and Fulton County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sikes v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2011cv01299
Petitioner:
Joseph Sikes
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail and Fulton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Trammell v. Fulton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2010cv03447
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Trammell
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Office and Robert Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Fulton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Earnest Stephens
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Office and Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02590
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mi00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
