Cases 41 - 50 of 67
GARVIN v. DALESIO et al
as 2:2012cv05320
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
DALESIO, TUMOLO, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GARVIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55882
Plaintiff:
JOHN H GARVIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARVIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56508
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH M. GARVIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARVIN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF et al
as 3:2011cv00211
Petitioner:
UMAR GARVIN
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CLEARFIELD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARVIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42258
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH M. GARVIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARVIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45149
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. GARVIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARVIN v. YATES et al
as 3:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
HEATHER M. YATES, RAYMOND SOBINA, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2011cv66154
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARY JEANETTE GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARVIN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF et al
as 2:2011cv02948
Petitioner:
UMAR GARVIN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
