Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Gilmore et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc
as 4:2011cv00719
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Gilmore and Rashawn Calhoun
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abramson et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Betty Davenport, Molly M Holub, Wells Farms Inc and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience Inc, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 2:2011cv04097
Plaintiff:
Tony Gilmore
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore v. Garrett et al
as 4:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Eugene Gilmore
Defendant:
Wilma Garrett and Bobby Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietz v. State of Missouri's 21st Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 4:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Larry B. Dietz
Defendant:
State of Missouri's 21st Judicial Circuit Court, Shelle Bartram and Joan M. Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore v. Cofield et al
as 4:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
James Gilmore
Defendant:
J. Cofield, Kathy Burton, J. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietz v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
Larry B. Dietz
Defendant:
State of Missouri, 21st Judicial Circuit, Shelle Bartram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Davies et al
as 4:2010cv01182
Plaintiff:
Sue Gilmore
Defendant:
Kathryn W. Davies, Reed Oven Company Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Reed Oven Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Dietz v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv02113
Plaintiff:
Larry B. Dietz
Defendant:
State of Missouri, 21st Judicial Circuit, Shelle Bartram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00038
Petitioner:
Donald Lavel Gilmore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
