Cases 41 - 50 of 349
JTH TAX LLC et al v. PIASCINSKI et al
as 5:2022cv01455
Defendant:
TINA PIASCINSKI, MICHAEL PIASCINSKI, TINA TRIMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
JTH TAX LLC doing business as LIBERTY TAX SERVICE and SIEMPRETAX+ LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
SIEMPRETAX+ LLC et al v. PIASCINSKI et al
as 2:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
SIEMPRETAX+ LLC and JTH TAX LLC D/B/A LIBERTY TAX SERVICE
Defendant:
MICHAEL PIASCINSKI, TINA PIASCINSKI and IT'S ALL GOOD BUSINESS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
GOODE v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2022cv01320
Petitioner:
JAMES GOODE
Respondent:
KYLE RUSSELL, JOSEPH SNELL and JEFFREY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HARVEY v. MILLER et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HARVEY
Defendant:
GEORGE MILLER, DEBRAH L CARPENTER, MELISA HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HARVEY
Defendant:
GEORGE MILLER, DEBRAH L CARPENTER, MELISA HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warman v. LivaNova USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Defendant:
Livanova Deutschland GMBH, LivaNova USA, Inc., Livanova Holding USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Warman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLOWAY v. BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON CALLOWAY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MARGARET STEVICK, SCOTT FARALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
ROLON v. Cherasard et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROLON
Defendant:
Arnold Cherasard, ST. MORITZ SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Leon Crockett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
